Notices and agendas

Please note the next ARPC meeting agenda is now available by clicking here – please click https://audleyparishcouncil.gov.uk/meetings/notices-and-agendas/

A letter has been sent today to Mr Gullis, Leader of the Borough Council asking for the recommendation to adopt the Local Plan to be reconsidered.

Please see link to the agenda for the Borough Council Full Council meeting on 8th July :
https://moderngov.newcastle-staffs.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=152&MId=4558&Ver=4

Please see link to the report recommending adoption of the Borough Council’s Local Plan on 8th July:
https://moderngov.newcastle-staffs.gov.uk/documents/s47516/Local%20Plan%20Adoption%20Report.pdf

Letter dated 1st July 2026:

Dear Mr Gullis

Many congratulations on your election as leader of Newcastle Borough Council.

Apologies for the direct approach in light of your conflict of interest, however further to the recent emails, it is appropriate to set out why Audley Rural Parish Council (APRC) has strongly objected to the inclusion of AB2 since it was first identified in the Issues and Options Consultation in 2021, after being a promoted by Indurent to the Borough Council.

ARPC urge you to reconsider your decision to adopt the Local Plan.  Even more so as there is an opportunity to put this on hold, with the requirement to revisit the Local Plan.

This is not a just a case of NIMBYism for a site to fulfil a need for employment in the Newcastle Borough’s Local Plan.  This goes far in excess of any need for the Borough.

The site will see the loss of 80 hectares of prime agricultural Green Belt land  (which is also the Borough’s green belt and farming land) turned over to create 6 “big box” distribution warehouses with 200 HGV lorry park.  This will support an employment need outside of the borough, most likely in other parts of Cheshire East and neighbouring Crewe town.

To put the AB2 size site in context – the site is the size of Audley village and Bignall End village put together.  If it were a residential scheme, we would be looking at approx. 2,400 homes at a low density of 30 dph (less some for green infrastructure) in a Parish consisting of 3,800 homes.  Therefore, whilst ARPC understand the concerns that other areas may have with the ongoing threat of small speculative developments (as do we), ARPC feels that our concerns on the size of development encroaching within our Parish is worthy of proper consideration, as it is excessive development already.

A number of houses directly face the site.  You only have to look at the size of the warehouses and the issues for the residents at Wigan to appreciate the enormous size of warehouses (18 meters)  and what this does to an area as a result of poor decisions taken by Wigan Council.   https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwy17pzxy13o

AB2 will consist of 6 “big box” buildings that are between 21- 24 meters in height – in context the same height as Buckingham Palace.  No amount of planning mitigations and disappearing paint will hide this at the gateway to Newcastle Borough.

This will also weaken the Green Belt in other areas in the Borough, especially with the grey belt implications – as no Green Belt is safe now unless it is adjacent to Kidsgrove or Newcastle Town.

You may also be aware that every time the traffic builds up to the Audley bridge on the A500 on the approach to the M6 J16, drivers, cyclists, horses from the local stables crossing the bridge on Alsager Road fear for their lives.   We have numerous reports of HGV lorries, cars, vans failing to give way and instead crossing at high speeds (60mph has been reported) in front of drivers to rejoin and beat the traffic on the A500.    This last year alone we have seen a huge increase in accidents and near misses caused by an already congested A500/M6 J16.    It is impossible to see how this situation can be improved upon by adding more pressure to the A500/M6 approach and installing traffic lights for vehicles to turn right across the A500.  In fact it is likely that the proposed solution will also see traffic building up on the other side heading towards Stoke, as cars and lorries queue from M6 J16 to turn across the A500 to access the only entrance to the site.

There is already evidence of single lanes and village roads being used to access M6 J16 when traffic builds – this will just push vehicles further away from the A500 onto village roads in all directions including neighbouring Parishes.

For your information attached are ARPC’s objections made on the current Planning Application which has yet to be decided by the Borough Council’s planning committee, and also representations which were made through Barristers at the Local Plan Examination hearings.

In the ARPC’s view this should have been stopped many years ago by the previous administration and the Parish has been let down, however ARPC now urge you to reconsider the recommendation to adopt and to stop this now.

AB2 planning application Statement v3 2505006 Final Submitted 260625 – Planning Application
Audley PC Site AB2 Employment V2.3 FINAL issued 01.05.25 – Local Plan Examination
Audley PC Site AB2 Green Belt V2.3 Final issued 01.05.25 – Local Plan Examination

Please see below advice from Staffordshire Police regarding swimming outdoors. Please also note there are ‘No Swimming‘ signs at the entrance and on the island at Leddys Field pond for good reason, and also you should not swim at Bateswood or Cloggers Pool due to unseen dangers.
Please click this link to access the webpage for the advice https://www.neighbourhoodalert.co.uk/Alerts/A/446750

Message Sent By Hannah Chaplin
(Staffordshire Police PCSO, Newcastle under Lyme)

Dangerous waters

As temperatures rise, swimming outdoors can seem like the perfect way to cool down. But swimming in open water — like rivers, lakes, reservoirs are extremely dangerous.

The Child Death Review Team has reported that teenagers are proportionately more likely to lose their lives to drowning
when temperatures exceed 25C, so it’s vital that everyone knows the risks associated with open water swimming.

If you work with children and families, or if you care for any children, make sure you’re sharing guidance on how to stay safe with them.

Know the Risk Factors:

– Cold Water Shock
Even on a hot day, open water can be cold enough to cause a sudden, involuntary gasp for air, muscle cramps, and panic. This reaction, known as cold water shock, can quickly overwhelm even confident swimmers.

– Strong Currents
Fast-moving water, tides, or undercurrents can easily sweep swimmers away — often faster than they can react or escape. These forces are unpredictable and can be fatal.

– Hidden Hazards
Open water often hides submerged rocks, rubbish, sudden drops, tangled weeds, and other unseen dangers. These can cause injury, entrapment, or panic.

Advice for Parents and Young People:
Avoid swimming in open water unless it’s a designated, lifeguarded area.

Talk openly to young people about the dangers and encourage them to think before entering the water.

Encourage safe alternatives like swimming pools or organized water activities with supervision.

Staying safe doesn’t mean missing out on fun — it means making informed, smart choices when it comes to water.

Please click here to view the post at https://www.neighbourhoodalert.co.uk/Alerts/A/445980

You can find the nominations for the Audley Borough Council ward here Audley BC Nominations (PDF)

• Anyone who is not registered to vote can register online (deadline now passed for these elections which was 20th April)
• Photo ID is needed at the polling station. Find out more here.

Links to detail of all candidates standing in the borough council election can be found here.

Please see below Notice of Poll and Situation of Polling Stations – Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council Election

You can find the nominations for the Audley Borough Council ward here Audley BC Nominations (PDF)

You can find the nominations for the Audley Ward of Newcastle under Lyme Borough Council here Audley BC Nominations (PDF)

Links to detail of all candidates standing in the Newcastle Borough Council election can be found here.

Voting in the 7th May 2026 Elections

• The deadline to register to vote is 11.59pm Monday, April 20
• The deadline to apply for a postal vote is 5pm Tuesday, April 21
• If you wish to nominate someone else to vote for you at the polling station, then that proxy vote must be applied for by 5pm Tuesday, April 28
• Anyone who is not registered to vote can register online.
• Photo ID is needed at the polling station. Find out more here.

Please click here to find out how to register to vote in the next Local Elections (Parish and Borough) Thurs 7th May 2026

This year, all Borough and Town/Parish elections are taking place, meaning that every current
councillor will retire and must reapply if they wish to stand again. There are 44 Borough seats and 122 Parish seats to be filled across the Borough. In 2022, there were 103 nominations for the Borough seats and 120 for the Parish seats. Of the 22 parish wards, only 5 were contested in 2022.

Audley Parish Council – Parish Wards (see below link to map of wards)
– Audley (Audley): 4 seats
– Audley (Bignall End): 6 seats
– Audley (Halmerend): 5 seats

Following the nominations deadline of 9th April 2026, the outcome was that the 3 Parish wards were uncontested – which means there were only enough candidates to fill the above seats and as a result did not require a contested vote on 7th May 2026.   All candidates have been elected accordingly following due process. The results are below:

Audley Parish Council -_Halmer End ward_- uncontested election results (PDF)
Audley Parish Council – Bignall_End ward – uncontested election (PDF)
Audley Parish Council –  Audley ward – uncontested election (PDF)

There is one vacancy for Halmer End which will be co-opted in May.  Applications will be invited in due course.

Details of all the town and parish council elections can be found here.

Please click here to view a map of the Parish Wards – Audley, Halmer End and Bignall End

Please see the agenda for the next meeting here 

Please click here to view the poster as PDF

**CAR PARK NOW OPEN (CHURCH STREET NEXT TO HERON FOODS AND TESCO) TUES 27TH JAN **

Following the earlier message, we have been able to complete the investigation works and drainage survey, and have now reopened the car park.

We have also carried out an interim tidy up. Please note that where the trial pits have been dug there is soft ground that will take a while to settle – so a contractor will return at a later date to top up the ground and level again. The main trial pit at the centre of the site (near the lower end) has barriers around it due to a mound left as there was still some water present when it was backfilled. Please avoid this area and please do not move the barriers.

Thank you to Rob Elliot Ltd, S Hough and S Till.

Apologies for the inconvenience caused while the work was underway and thank you again for your understanding.

Actions for A500/Alsager Road junction

The Parish Council is in regular direct contact with officers at National Highways, who are responsible for the A500 and the slip road, to campaign for action following the previous and ongoing accidents.

We are aware that there have been two further accidents reported since the temporary signs were installed, plus regular near misses due to drivers seeking to avoid congestion. This information is passed onto National Highways, please continue to report any near misses.

We have received the following update from National Highways, and want to keep you informed given the ongoing concerns:

Upgraded signing on slip road
The works are committed, and National Highways are aiming to complete the upgrade by 31 March 2026.

Collision Data
National Highways will continue to analyse the collision data to establish the primary causation factors as and when Staffordshire Police release their reports to Staffordshire County Council.

M6 J16
The anecdotal evidence of increased usage of the slip roads at the A500/Alsager Road junction (westbound) is to queue jump congestion on the A500. Traffic signal engineers have reviewed the timings of the signals at M6 J16 and have concluded the signals are working as intended (no faults identified). The problem is down to traffic growth and an ageing asset. The M6 J16 junction layout simply cannot accommodate 2026 and beyond vehicle capacity as it exceeds the current design geometry. Unfortunately, the junction is not a priority for future road investment in the short term.

Alsager Road
The local road is managed by Staffordshire County Council (SCC) who have agreed to review road safety. SCC will forward their conclusions including any actions they are able to deliver in due course.

In vehicle SAT NAV Technology
Examples of google desktop sat nav tool prioritising the slip road rather than staying on the A500 have been raised at partnership meetings with the leading suppliers of sat nav technology. The response is they will investigate but have made it clear motorists have a duty to drive within the law and follow guidance contained within the Highway Code. In car technology is provided to improve the driver experience but the driver is ultimately responsible for ensuring they continue to drive with due care and attention.

The Police have also advised they will carry out sat nav tests using their vehicles. Report will be provided in due course.

Continued monitoring
National Highways Inspectors will continue to check the junction as part of their weekly route safety checks. Any safety critical issues identified such as fading road markings or vegetation compromising visibility will be defected and fixed in line with the contractual timelines.

Camera survey
A survey has been completed. Results are awaited of any findings of interest.

Temporary signing
Temporary signing to remain in place until the works to upgrade the permanent signing has been completed.

Contact details for National Highways:

https:/www.nationalhighways.co.uk
Customer Service No.: 0300 123 5000 or email info@nationalhighways.co.uk

Please click here to view Notices and agendas